Overview and introduction

Australian state and territory Departments of Health have signed a Memorandum of Understanding for mutual acceptance of ethical and scientific review of the multi-centre human research projects undertaken in Public Health Organisations. Currently Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia are participating in National Mutual Acceptance (NMA).

The scope of NMA includes any form of human research as defined in the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC, 2007) for which an application must be made to a HREC for the purpose of being conducted at a public health organisation.

Aims and intent

As part of broader ethics and governance reform, NMA will help reduce duplication in the conduct of scientific and ethical review of multi-jurisdictional research.  Apart from some exemptions that apply within each jurisdiction, each proposal for a multi-centre human research study conducted in PHOs within the participating jurisdictions will be ethically and scientifically reviewed once.

Participating jurisdictions

Currently, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory and Western Australia participate in NMA.  The scheme is structured to admit further jurisdictions within Australia as and when they have developed their frameworks and are ready to participate. Investigators, trial coordinators, sponsors, and contract research organisations (CROs) should check with the relevant jurisdictions’ websites visit NMA Facts to confirm the status of participation in NMA.

Exemptions from NMA

The following types of studies will continue to be excluded from NMA because of jurisdiction-specific requirements:

  • Projects involving persons in custody or staff of the jurisdictional Justice Health departments
  • Projects specifically affecting the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities
  • Projects requiring access to state-wide data collections
  • Projects involving access to coronial material
  • First Time in Human (FTIH), Phase 0 and Phase 1 clinical trials (in SA only)

Other jurisdiction-specific exemptions apply.  Please review the NMA Facts and the  NMA Standard Principles for Operation for more information.  

Site Specific Assessment

PHOs will continue to undertake a site-specific assessment (SSA) of all research projects that are to be conducted at institutions (sites) under their control, in compliance with the relevant jurisdictional standard operating procedures. These should also be read in conjunction with the  NMA Standard Principles for Operation.

NMA procedures

Under NMA, applications for scientific and ethical review of studies must be submitted on a Human Research Ethics Form (HREA) via the Online Forms website .   If at least one study site is located in Victoria, a Victorian Specific Module must also be completed.

Whilst the NMA Scheme applies to public health organisations, private health organisations may accept the review of a NHMRC-certified reviewing HREC.  Some jurisdictions may have certain ethical review requirements for private health organisations.  Investigators should contact the relevant jurisdiction for more information.

Further information and resources

Standard Principles for Operation (Principles)

The Standard Principles for Operation describes some common principles relevant to NMA. The Principles provide general guidance for investigators, trial coordinators, sponsors, CROs and other parties undertaking clinical trials within health organisations. For details of operating procedures in each State or Territory, refer to the relevant jurisdictional websites listed at Appendix 3 of the Principles.

Information for investigators

The NMA Fatcs and  National Mutual Acceptance Brochure are intended to provide information in an easy-to-use format for research offices to distribute to their research communities.

Research study checklist

The Ethics checklist should be completed by the Co-ordinating Principal Investigator and included with every new research project submitted to a certified HREC for review under NMA.

Participating organisations and local contacts

HRECs, RGOs, and Organisations provides lists and contact information for each:

  • Certified Reviewing HREC
  • Participating Research Governance Office
  • Participating Organisation

in each of the participating jurisdictions (NSW, QLD, SA, VIC).

Jurisdictional legislative requirements

Jurisdictional Legislative Requirements aims to provide an overview of the various legislative and administrative frameworks that currently exist in the Commonwealth and the participating jurisdictions and applies to the approval of human research under NMA. The document is not a substitute for competent legal advice.

Monitoring and reporting

The Monitoring and Reporting Framework is intended as a guide for organisations and individuals involved with NMA and is designed to assist understanding of monitoring and reporting processes involved in ethical review and research governance of human research. It provides an overview of monitoring and reporting for clinical trials and sets out the responsibilities of researchers, sponsors, HRECs and institutions in the operation of mutual acceptance.

The  Monitoring and reporting tables are designed to assist Investigators, HREC Coordinators and Research Governance Officers (RGOs). They provide information on the reporting requirements for multi-centre clinical trials taking place in States and Territories.

They cover, in the context of a multi-centre clinical trial:

  • Coordinating Principal Investigator Reporting
  • Principal Investigator Site Reporting
  • Reviewing HREC Correspondence Regarding HREC Review & Post-
  • Approval Monitoring
  • RGO Correspondence
Page Updated: Wednesday 23 August 2017