Excellence in Allied Health Awards nomination criteria

​​​​​​​Nominations are to be submitted by a Director of Allied Health from a local health district or specialty health network.

Nominees should display exceptional capability in all areas of excellence. A written submission, addressing the reason for nomination (maximum 200 words) and the three areas of excellence (maximum 300 words each) is required in the nomination. Please include specific examples or stories to support responses.

Marking rubric (PDF)​

On this page

  • Allied Health Professional of the Year

    The Allied Health Professional of the Year makes an outstanding contribution to clinical excellence, leadership, education, and culture. They advocate for evidence-based practice, focus on value-based health care, and provide safe, quality, and compassionate patient care. They actively support a positive culture and show kindness, in line with the NSW Health CORE values.

    This allied health professional shows commitment to supporting, empowering, and upskilling those around them. They passionately advocate for better patient outcomes through allied health services and collaborate across professions and services to achieve this. The individual is recognised by peers for their outstanding professionalism and the continuous demonstration of pride to be an allied health professional within NSW Health.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Professional of the Year are:

    • recognised by peers for their professionalism and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values
    • demonstrates outstanding contribution to clinical excellence and/or innovation
    • commitment to work effectively to provide safe, quality and evidence-based care that elevates the human experience.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Recognised by peers for their professionalism, kindness and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health direction.
      • Demonstrated recognition of professionalism, kindness and role modelling the NSW Health CORE values at a profession, organisation. LHD/SHN, state, national or international level.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence- based practice.
      • Demonstrated recognition of professionalism, kindness and role modelling the NSW Health CORE values at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence.
      • Demonstrated recognition of professionalism, kindness and role modelling the NSW Health CORE values at a local, team, or service level.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Demonstrates outstanding contribution to clinical excellence and/or innovation

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in their contribution to clinical excellence and/or innovation.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Demonstrates a great contribution to clinical excellence and/or innovation.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Demonstrates a moderate contribution to clinical excellence and/or innovation.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Commitment to work effectively to provide safe, quality and evidence-based care that elevates the human experience

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health direction.
      • Demonstrates an unwavering level of commitment.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Demonstrates a high level of commitment.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and partial evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Demonstrates a moderate commitment.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

    ​
  • Allied Health Leader of the Year

    The Allied Health Leader of the Year has continuously exhibited excellence in leadership, focusing on the values of teamwork, innovation, service, quality, compassion, and integrity. They show exceptional skills to support, mentor, and coach staff.

    The Allied Health Leader of the Year is a visionary. They drive quality improvement in patient care, service delivery and a commitment to value-based health care. They are leaders of a positive culture and demonstrate kindness across professional groups in line with NSW Health's CORE values. They are proud to be an allied health professional working in NSW Health.

    The nominee does not have to be working in a management/senior role.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Leader of the Year are:

    • provides professional and visionary leadership
    • commitment to supporting, empowering and upskilling all within healthcare
    • uses their leadership and influence to lead positive organisational culture and elevate the human experience.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Provides professional and visionary leadership

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • The nominee is recognised for their professional and visionary leadership at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • The nominee is recognised for their professional and visionary leadership at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • The nominee is recognised for their professional and visionary leadership at a local, team or service level.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Commitment to supporting, empowering and upskilling all within healthcare

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in their ability to support, empower, and upskill all within healthcare.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly supports, empowers, and upskills all within healthcare.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately supports, empowers, and upskills all within healthcare.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Uses their leadership and influence to lead positive organisational culture and elevate the human experience

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in their ability to use their leadership and influence to lead positive organisational culture and elevate the human experience.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly uses their leadership and influence to lead positive organisational culture and elevate the human experience.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately uses their leadership and influence to lead positive organisational culture and elevate the human experience.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

  • Early Career Allied Health Professional of the Year

    The Early Career Allied Health Professional of the Year has shown exceptional potential during their first two years of practice. They are committed to supporting a positive culture and showing kidness in line with the NSW Health CORE values and are proud to be an allied health professional working in NSW Health.

    This early career allied health professional demonstrates passion and commitment to the provision of quality, safe and compassionate care to patients and their family/caregivers. They are committed to seeking continuous learning opportunities and are driven to demonstrate emerging clinical excellence for their discipline.

    The nominee must be less than 2 years post-graduation at the time of nomination to their District Allied Health Awards.

    The areas of excellence for Early Career Allied Health Professional of the Year are:

    • emerging clinical excellence for their profession
    • delivers safe, quality and compassionate patient care that elevates the human experience
    • demonstrates initiative, emerging leadership and professionalism beyond their career stage.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Emerging clinical excellence for their profession

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstration of emerging clinical excellence.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates emerging clinical excellence.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates emerging clinical excellence.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Delivers safe, quality and compassionate patient care that elevates the human experience

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstration of ability to deliver safe, quality and compassionate patient care.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates ability to deliver safe, quality and compassionate patient care.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates ability to deliver safe, quality and compassionate patient care.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Demonstrates initiative, emerging leadership and professionalism beyond their career stage

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstration of initiative, emerging leadership and professionalism beyond their career stage.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates initiative, emerging leadership and professionalism beyond their career stage.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates initiative, emerging leadership and professionalism beyond their career stage.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

  • Aboriginal Allied Health Professional of the Year

    The Aboriginal Allied Health Professional of the Year demonstrates exceptional commitment, professionalism, kindness and compassionate care to all patients. They are committed to improving and advocating for the culturally appropriate health care of Aboriginal peoples and communities and are proud to be an allied health professional working in NSW Health.

    The Aboriginal Allied Health Professional of the Year demonstrates their leadership through passionate advocacy for their profession by contributing to the growth and development of the Aboriginal allied health workforce in NSW Health.

    The nominee must identify as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person.

    The areas of excellence for the Aboriginal Allied Health Professional of the Year are:

    • commitment to elevating the human experience and is an active champion for culturally appropriate health care for Aboriginal people
    • models closing the gap by working in partnership with Aboriginal people and/or communities to promote better health outcomes individually or collectively
    • supports agency actions to build culturally safe spaces and services for Aboriginal patients, visitors, staff and volunteers through their practices and partnerships with other clinicians and departments.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Commitment to elevating the human experience and is an active champion for culturally appropriate health care for Aboriginal people

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for both elements. This is underpinned by evidence- based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstration of commitment to elevating the human experience and culturally appropriate health care.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for both elements. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence- based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates commitment to elevating the human experience and culturally appropriate health care.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for both elements.
      • Moderately demonstrates commitment to elevating the human experience and culturally appropriate health care.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Models closing the gap by working in partnership with Aboriginal people and/or communities to promote better health outcomes individually or collectively

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence- based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in ability to work in partnership with Aboriginal people and/or communities to promote better health outcomes.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates the ability to work in partnership with Aboriginal people and/or communities to promote better health outcomes.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and partial evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates the ability to work in partnership with Aboriginal people and/or communities to promote better health outcomes.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Supports agency actions to build culturally safe spaces and services for Aboriginal patients, visitors, staff and volunteers through their practices and partnerships with other clinicians and departments

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in support for agency actions to build culturally safe spaces through their practices and partnerships.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly supports agency actions to build culturally safe spaces and services through their practices and partnerships.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and partial evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately supports agency actions to build culturally safe spaces through their practices and partnerships.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

  • Allied Health Assistant/Technician/Support Person of the Year

    The Allied Health Assistant/Technician/Support Person of the Year consistently provides exceptional and high-quality support for allied health professions and allied health services.

    They actively support a positive culture in line with NSW Health's CORE values and are proud to be an Allied Health Assistant/Technician/Support Person working in NSW Health. This individual demonstrates a commitment to elevating the human experience by being the backbone of the allied health service for their organisation. They show professionalism and are a proven team player.

    The nominee must have a dedicated Allied Health Assistant, Technician and/or Support Person role, which may include providing administrative support.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Assistant/Technician/Support Person of the Year are:

    • significantly contributes to supporting allied health and is a proven team player within the multidisciplinary environment
    • provides safe, quality and patient focused assistance
    • elevates the human experience.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Significantly contributes to supporting allied health and is a proven team player within the multidisciplinary environment

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for both elements.
      • Exceeds expectations in support for allied health and teamwork in a multidisciplinary environment.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for both elements.
      • Greatly demonstrates supporting allied health and teamwork in a multidisciplinary environment.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for both elements.
      • Moderately demonstrates supporting allied health and teamwork in a multidisciplinary environment.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Provides safe, quality and patient focused assistance

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Exceeds expectations in delivery of safe, quality and patient focused assistance.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Greatly delivers safe, quality and patient focused assistance.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately delivers safe, quality and patient focused assistance.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Elevates the human experience

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Exceeds expectations in ability to elevate the human experience.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Greatly elevates the human experience.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderate elevation of the human experience.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

  • Allied Health Researcher of the Year

    The Allied Health Researcher of the Year has made exemplary contributions to research to enhance allied Health practice and services. Their activities have been impactful and can be translated into practice, and they are proud to be an allied health professional working in NSW Health.

    The Allied Health Researcher of the Year holds a clinical or clinical leadership role and may or may not have protected research time. They may be completing a higher degree by research or hold a conjoint academic appointment in addition to their clinical role, but this is not their primary role. They contribute to building capacity to conduct and translate research in allied health services, for example by supervising research students, leading research teams, or mentoring novice researchers.

    This award is open to researchers with any level of experience. Applications will be assessed based on the impact of their research in NSW Health and how they are supporting clinicians to implement research in clinical practice as well as build research capacity.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Researcher of the Year are:

    • research that is published in peer reviewed scientific journals, contributing to the evidence base for allied health practice in their field, and has led work to translate this research into practice
    • partners with consumers, communities, colleagues and/or academic partners to conduct research that contributes to consumer-centred improvements in clinical care or health service delivery
    • empowers and upskills allied health clinicians in research and fosters a progressive culture of learning and innovation.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Research that is published in peer reviewed scientific journals, contributing to the evidence base for Allied Health practice in their field, and has led work to translate this research into practice*

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in ability to contribute to peer reviewed research, evidence- based practice and translational research.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Has greatly contributed to peer reviewed research, evidence-based practice and translational research.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Has moderately contributed to peer reviewed research, evidence-based practice and translational research.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Partners with consumers, communities, colleagues and/or academic partners to conduct research that contributes to consumer-centred improvements in clinical care or health service delivery

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Has worked in partnership with consumers in equal roles in most or all elements of multiple research projects, including research design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of results, dissemination of findings.
      • May have an established group/network of consumers who partner in research projects.
      • May provide leadership to others in how to partner with consumers in research.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Has worked in partnership with consumers in multiple elements of research studies, with evidence that the consumer role has influenced key aspects of the study.
      • May have included consumers in authorship or conference papers, or in other presentations.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Has worked in partnership with consumers in some elements of a small number of research projects.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Empowers and upskills allied health clinicians in research and fosters a progressive culture of learning and innovation

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and strategic evidence for both elements. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in ability to support allied health clinicians to engage in research, develop their research skills, and has empowered and foster a progressive culture of learning and innovation.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for both elements. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Has greatly supported allied health clinicians to engage in research, develop their research skills, and has empowered and fostered a progressive culture of learning and innovation.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for both elements.
      • Has moderately supported allied health clinicians to engage in research, develop their research skills, and has empowered and fostered a progressive culture of learning and innovation.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.

  • Allied Health Educator of the Year

    The Allied Health Educator of the Year has made exemplary contributions to the education of others to improve allied health services. This could include teaching of allied health professional peers, students, other health disciplines, patients, or the general public. They demonstrate kindness and are proud to be an allied health professional working in NSW Health.

    Their activities have been impactful to improve the practice standards of allied health professionals, the knowledge of specific health conditions or the understanding of allied health services. Education provided can be part of a formal teaching role or in an informal capacity.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Educator of the Year are:

    • outstanding contribution to education and improvement of clinical standards
    • commitment to supporting, empowering and upskilling students and staff
    • actively contributes to a positive and progressive learning culture, including that which elevates the human experience.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Outstanding contribution to education and improvement of clinical standards

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Demonstrated contribution as an educator is at a profession, organisation. LHD/SHN, state, national or international level.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Demonstrated contribution as an educator is at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Demonstrated contribution as an educator is within the scope of their role.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Commitment to supporting, empowering and upskilling students and staff

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Demonstrates an unwavering level of commitment.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Demonstrates a high level of commitment.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Demonstrates moderate commitment.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Actively contributes to a positive and progressive learning culture, including that which elevates the human experience

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in their cultivation of a positive and progressive learning culture.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates cultivating a positive and progressive learning culture.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates cultivating a positive and progressive learning culture.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.​

  • Allied Health Team of the Year

    The Allied Health Team of the Year recognises a team whose collective expertise, collaboration and commitment have delivered outstanding outcomes. The team demonstrates exemplary clinical practice innovation and shared leadership, working together to deliver high‑quality, value‑based and person‑centred care, while fostering a positive, kind and inclusive culture aligned with the NSW Health CORE values.

    The nominated team exemplifies strong collaboration, leadership and effective partnerships to improve patient outcomes, service delivery and staff experience. The nomination should clearly demonstrate how coordinated, team-based practice, shared accountability and the complementary contributions of team members directly enabled the outcomes achieved. The outcomes recognised through this award should be attributable to allied health leadership and/or practice.

    The areas of excellence for the Allied Health Team of the Year are:

    • exceptional collaboration, demonstrating effective teamwork, mutual respect, Allied Health clinical leadership and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values
    • commitment to high‑quality, person‑centred care, delivering evidence and value‑based services, programs or initiatives that improve patient outcomes and experiences that were only made possible through the collective contribution of the team
    • positive impact on people and culture, demonstrating kindness and a sustained commitment to fostering an inclusive, empowered and high‑performing team.

    Justification of nomination

    This section, though not independently scored, is mandatory to complete. It provides context that may aid the judging panel in evaluating other criteria such as impact, skills/knowledge, and commitment.

    Area of excellence #1: Exceptional collaboration, demonstrating effective teamwork, mutual respect, Allied Health clinical leadership and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values*

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for both elements. This is underpinned by evidence- based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstration of collaboration, effective teamwork, mutual respect, Allied Health clinical leadership and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for both elements. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence- based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates collaboration, effective teamwork, mutual respect, Allied Health clinical leadership and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence
      • Moderately demonstrates collaboration, effective teamwork, mutual respect, Allied Health clinical leadership and role modelling of the NSW Health CORE values.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #2: Commitment to high-quality, person-centred care, delivering evidence and value-based services, programs or initiatives that improve patient outcomes and experiences that were only made possible through the collective contribution of the team*

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in the team’s ability to improve patient outcomes and experience by providing high-quality, person-centred care and delivering evidence and value-based services, programs or initiatives.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates the team’s ability to improve patient outcomes and experience by providing high-quality, person-centred care and delivering evidence and value-based services, programs or initiatives.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and partial evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates the team’s ability to improve patient outcomes and experience by providing high-quality, person-centred care and delivering evidence and value-based services, programs or initiatives
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Area of excellence #3: Demonstrating a positive impact on people and culture, through kindness and a sustained commitment to fostering an inclusive, empowered and high-performing team*

    Score: 1-12

    • Outstanding (10-12)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with strong detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This is underpinned by evidence-based practice and/or alignment with NSW Health strategic direction.
      • Exceeds expectations in demonstrating a positive impact on people and culture, through kindness and a sustained commitment to fostering an inclusive, empowered and high-performing team.
    • Good (7-9)
      • Justification is clear, directly related and is presented with good detail and evidence for the area of excellence. This may be underpinned by demonstrating evidence-based practice.
      • Greatly demonstrates a positive impact on people and culture, through kindness and a sustained commitment to fostering an inclusive, empowered and high-performing team.
    • Meets requirements (4-6)
      • Justification is clear and is presented with adequate detail and partial evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Moderately demonstrates a positive impact on people and culture, through kindness and a sustained commitment to fostering an inclusive, empowered and high-performing team.
    • Limited evidence (1-3)
      • Brief, superficial, or unclear justification and/or limited evidence for the area of excellence.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Impact demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence

    Score: 1-8

    • Outstanding (7-8)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with strong detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation, LHD/SHN, state, national or international level
        • across other professional groups
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups and beyond.
    • Good (5-6)
      • Impact is clear, directly related to areas of excellence, is presented with good detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a profession, organisation or LHD/SHN level
        • across AH professions
        • on patients, colleagues, minority groups and disadvantaged groups.
    • Meets requirements (3-4)
      • Impact is clear and is presented with adequate detail and evidence. Impact may be:
        • at a departmental level
        • within a profession
        • on patients and colleagues
    • Limited evidence (1-2)
      • Brief, superficial or unclear justification and/or limited evidence of impact.
      • Insufficient detail or examples are provided.

    Skills and knowledge demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Skills and knowledge are highly critical and highly valuable to allied health.
    • Good (3): Skills and knowledge are directly linked to improvement and promoting allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Skills and knowledge are inherently valuable to their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Skills and knowledge may add some value to allied health.

    Commitment to allied health demonstrated throughout the areas of excellence*

    Score: 1-4

    • Outstanding (4): Evidence of being well established within allied health and recognised across discipline, organisation or state.
    • Good (3): Evidence of being established within allied health.
    • Meets requirements (2): Some evidence of working with their profession and/or allied health.
    • Limited evidence (1): Limited evidence of working with allied health.

    Total score: 52

    *Guideline will be provided to the judging panel to assist with scoring.​

Current as at: Tuesday 4 August 2026